Degas Makes Pastel Landscapes Dance, plus Pouilly Fuissé Wine.

Houses by the Sea by Edgar Degas, 1869 normandythenandnow.com Click on picture to magnify.

Edgar Degas (1833-1917), according to many of his own words, was decidedly not one of those “plein air landscape painters.” You know the ones, Monet, Pissarro, Sisley, who ran about outside to capture the changing moods of the light on the river or the ocean (possibly being nearly swept away as Monet once was) or standing about in the snow to look at the colored reflections on the ice. Well, they were just not in Degas’ mode of thinking. As he once firmly put it, “Painting is not a sport!” Degas and his close colleague, Edouard Manet, were studio painters. Staying inside where they could adjust the light, have all their equipment about them and be undisturbed by blowing winds, crashing waves, and the occasional insect, was just more civilized. Of course, this does not mention the fact that it was so much easier to go off to that favorite haunt of Manet’s crowd, the Café Guerbois, have a smoke, some wine, and talk about what they were creating. And yet, Degas created some of the most beautiful landscapes of the Impressionist period. So what happened and how?

Probably the best place to start is with a comment made about the artist by one of his longest lasting friends (and he did not have too many), Camille Pissarro, who said of Degas, “He is an anarchist, but in art.” Impressionism was all about a certain type of art anarchy. It was a break with the old school’s classically formatted, huge paintings of notable figures and stories from history, ancient mythology, and the Bible. Degas strove to take it a step further. He refused to let nature dictate what was represented in his paintings, saying, “A painting is first of all the product of the imagination of the artist.” That statement allows the viewer to understand the difference in the conception of color and the artificial quality seen in Degas’ landscapes when compared to those of his Impressionist contemporaries.

For instance, in the painting below, Field of Flax (1891-1892), it is rather unlikely that such a neat, lovely, violet and pink square of flax, would appear laid out like a carpet amid the other dull patches of perhaps cultivated fields in this hilly forest-like landscape. Except for the bright spots of yellow in the foreground, the field of flax is the superstar in this painting, almost inviting the viewer to go lie down on this colorful natural blanket.

Field of Flax by Edgar Degas, 1891-92 Private Collection. Photo from wikiart.org

While Field of Flax seems to be just one of Degas imagined scenes of nature, perhaps based on a memory or a dream(?), he was also able to capture in his painting one of the concerns of the day, the rapid encrouchment of industrialization.

Landscape with Smokestacks by Edgar Degas, 1890. Art Institute of Chicaco artic.edu Click on picture to magnify.

The smokestacks in the distance of Landscape with Smokestacks, where the black smoke is a counterpoint to the natural loveliness of the scene, the nature itself is a bit fantasized, with even some of the trees in the field being represented with the fuzzy, smoke-like quality of smokestacks. The landscape seems to be a comment on nature versus industry, with those smoky trees indicating the invasion of industrialization into what had been pristine loveliness. The cluster of flowers in the foreground add wonderful color that fades into distinct violets and greens as the land stretches out before us. However, there are large barren areas in that land, begging the visual question of what has blighted the area.

It has been said that Degas’ landscapes are made from imagination and memory. Memories, as we all know, are rather fuzzy, partially faded, not exact, and prone to imaginative flourishes. Degas was able to add to this quality of the not-quite-real by using rather unusual methods to create his landscapes. Degas was a master of painting with pastels, as can be seen in his early landscapes of the Normandy coast done around 1869, as well as his famous ballerinas, bathers, and horses. However, in the mid-1870s, he was introduced to monotype printing, a format that allows the artist to draw with inks on a metal plate, then press one print to create a completely unique work of art. Degas took the process a step further by pressing yet another print from the ink left over. This degraded version of the print was then worked again with pastels to create another distinct piece of art. It is that process that one sees in his landscapes from the 1880s forward. The process is described and visually shown in this short video, Edgar Degas: A Strange New Beauty youtube.com

As a young man, Degas was very much influenced by the art of Jean-Auguste Dominique Ingres, a Neoclassical painter. Ingres told the young Degas to “focus on the line.” Degas took this tip to heart, as line was the key to one of the things that attracted him the most: movement. His famous work of the dancers, horses, etc. were all about the study of movement. However, his landscapes are also influenced by this attention to line, and sometimes the lines found in the human body. In the painting below one can make out the representation of a shoulder. Degas said when viewing a block of granite, “What a beautiful line, beautiful like a shoulder. I will make a steep embankment, with a view of the sea.”

Coastal Landscape by Edgar Degas, c. 1890 Pastel over monotype print. Click on picture to magnify.

Et voilà! There it is. It is rugged and rough, but one can make out the general shape of a well-muscled shoulder with an arm descending at its side. Degas makes this outcrop overlooking the sea into a hillside of rock and flowering plants, using tonal harmonies in yellows and oranges with a counterpoint of green, though the inspiration was from his figure drawing.

Degas pushed the envelop as only he could, preferring to experiment in his studio with line, movement, and the effects of imagination and memory to move the landscape into new territory. We plein air painters can forgive him for being as unique as his pastel-treated monotypes.

For a slide show of Degas’ wonderful landscapes in pastels and pastel over monotype, see this Edgar Degas video (in three languages) youtube.com .

Degas’ Influence on a Painter of the Southwest.

Warm Sunset by Sandra Pérez. Click on picture to magnify.

Sandra Pérez is a native of California, who spent long years in the northwestern city of Seattle before being completely captivated by the wonders of the southwestern landscape in and around Santa Fe, New Mexico, where she now lives. She works in pastels, and Edgar Degas’ pastel landscapes are among her favored inspirations. Unlike Degas, she is a plein air painter, even always carrying a small assortment of soft pastels and a little notebook with her in order to capture quick sketches of views that inspire her as she moves about her daily activities. The places sketched are often returned to for further plein air work.

Her handling of the different shades of yellows and oranges is reminiscent of Degas’ color combinations for his Coastal Landscape. Little bits of distinction can be noted in the field of yellowed grasses, just as we see similar variation among the plants on Degas’ seacliff. Likewise the color that is the counterbalance to the yellow and orange is green. In various shades from light spring green highlighted by sunlight to the deep brownish greens with purple shadows, it makes for a cool contrast to those sunny colors, as strongly massed together as is Degas’ “shoulder-like” cliff overlooking the sea.

Pérez does do finishing touches on her work in her studio. (Ah ha! says Degas.) However, whether in the studio or out in the field, the role that Degas established for creating a certain feeling in the use of pastels is honored, amplified, and continued here far from France in the wilds of the southwestern U.S.A.

For more on the work of Sandra Pérez, go to “Sandra Pérez: Poetry in Pastel” vernellestudio.com/blog

The paintings used in this article are in public domain or used with the permission of the artist. Reference source on Degas is Degas by Bernd Crowe, Taschen Publications (2005).

Marjorie Vernelle is an artist, writer, college professor, and traveler. For more see the Pages at ofartandwine.com or her author page at amazon.com and her art at Vernelle Art Boutique vernellestudio.com.

Oh, those wines of Burgundy! Pouilly Fuissé

Vineyards of Burgundy. Photo Credit to Liz Palmer liz-palmer.com

Well, there you see it. Burgundy, that fabled area of France that as a duchy once was a real rival for power to the kingdom of France (think Joan of Arc days). While Joan did not fare so well, Burgundy, though finally integrated into France, still remains an area with its own culture and cultural contributions. One of those is a special wine made of Chardonnay grapes that takes the name of a southern Burgundian wine growing region known as Pouilly. From there come white wines like Pouilly Vinzelle and Pouilly Loche, but the most famous is Pouilly Fuissé.

At this point, we must practice our French. The pronunciation is like this: Pooh- yee Fwee-say (I beg the pardon of my linguistics profs for not using proper transcription, but pop culture wins here). Now that we know how to do that, the next thing is not to mix it up with Pouilly Fumé, which is another French wine but from the western side of France in the Loire Valley. It is made of Sauvignon Blanc grapes and is the subject of another Of Art and Wine post “The Hazy Light of Corot and the Light Smoke of Pouilly Fumé” Fumé by the way means smoked, a taste that comes into the wine from the flint in the limestone that underlies the northern Loire Valley.

Glasses of Chardonnay wine Photo credit: townandcountrymagazine.com

Pouilly Fuissé comes by its rich flavor, described as a taste of pears and apples, with a bit of lemon and a buttery finish, by going through a distinct process, called “split oaking.” During fermentation 2/3s of the grapes are fermented in stainless steel containers, while 1/3 is fermented in oak barrels. What this does is tame the sometimes too buttery taste that Chardonnay is sometimes known for, especially when one recalls the Chardonnays of the 1980s when oaking went overboard. In the split-oaking process, the fruity notes are allowed to emerge, accented by that tang of lemon before one’s palate is warmed by a mild taste of butter.

Seafood platter, a perfect pair for Pouilly Fuissé.

Well, I will tell you my hands-down favorite thing to have with this wine. It’s freshed picked crab (king, snow or Dungeness) with fresh lemon and a mild garlic touch in some hot melted butter for dipping. However, if you wish to enjoy this wine with more everyday foods, you can enjoy it with smoked salmon, artichokes with Hollandaise sauce, roast chicken or just a plain old quiche. Serve the wine chilled at about 46 degrees, and you are good to go for some fine dining.

So whatever your choice of meals, if it includes fish, seafood or simple, lightly roasted chicken, Pouilly Fuissé is a wonderful wine to pair with it. Should you decide you want a full bodied red for your winter meat dishes, Burgundy has those, too. You really can’t lose if you go Burgundian.

While we can’t travel much these days, we can still have our fine wine experience by joining a wine club. Cellars Wine Club of International Wines is a excellent way to experience wines from around the world and decide by wine where you will be traveling in future. Cellars has a number of wine clubs, one for every level of taste and budget, a “no bad bottle” return policy, and free shipping. See the page under Of Art and Wine Pages.

Photos used in this section are free stock photos from iStock.com and dreamstime.com.

Of Art and Wine affiliates with Bluehost.com and CellarsWineClub.com and may earn from qualifying purchases.

©marjorie vernelle 2020

Coming Soon: The Fine Art of Drawing, and Wine for After Dinner, Marsala.

Drawing of the Portrait of Caravaggio by Ottavio Leoni, National Gallery of London

Drawing is hard, even drawing from a portrait, let alone from real life. However, drawing is one of humankind’s oldest art forms, and well worth a good look. Since Caravaggio here spent time in southern Italy, we will get acquainted with Marsala, a bracing after dinner wine, straight out of Sicily.

One Model, Two Artists, Great Art, and Wine in Franche-Comte.

Jo, la belle irlandaise, by Gustave Courbet. 1865-1866 National Museum, Stockholm, Sweden. Click picture to magnify.

The woman above, Jo Hifferman, was one of the most famous artist’s models ever. She appears in several celebrated paintings by James McNeill Whistler (obviously, she is not his mother), as well as a series of portraits done by Gustave Courbet, among them the one above and three others of a similar pose. The role of the artist’s model is essential to the art, yet is largely unsung. One of the most harrowing stories is of the model for John Edward Millais’ Ophelia (1851-1852), which shows a young woman floating in a small stream where she has supposedly drowned as that character did in Hamlet. The apocryphal tale is that the model spent hours floating in a tub of cold water to capture the appropriate look of poor, dead, Ophelia. Whether true or not, it captures the way that the models often “suffer for art,” holding interminable poses until the body decides, dead or alive, that rigor mortis must set in.

Then there’s seeing what the artist has created. A friend of mine used to model for her artist husband until, as she says, “I got tired of posing long hours only to see my beautiful body turned into some kind of futuristic chair.” Oops! Let me just say right now, as an artist, that we love all artist’s models, whoever you are and wherever you are. You are truly appreciated. However, only a few artist’s models go down in history by name. Yes, there is Victorine Meurent who posed for Manet’s Olympia, and Andrew Wyeth’s Helga, but basically not many are known by name. Jo Hifferman, however, is known by two names, Joanna Hifferman and Jo, la belle irlandaise (Jo, the beautiful Irish woman).

Her career started with James McNeill Whistler, an American who was living in London at the time. For Whistler the first painting was an experiment in painting white on white. Whistler, who was a great lover of music, originally titled the paintings Symphony in White 1 and 2, just as his later paintings of evenings on the Thames were called Nocturnes, another musical reference. Whistler had not yet gotten involved with the Pre-Raphaelites, but they later lauded these paintings as precursors to their own movement, which sought to emphasize the purity and simplicity of art as it was before Raphael. Jo Hifferman was all of 20 and 22 when she posed for these charming, rather virginal paintings.

Then they went to France. Whistler took Jo with him as she had become his mistress, despite the warnings of his family that she was “a loose woman.” Obviously from those paintings, he perhaps did not wish to see her that way. Whistler, himself, had a reputation for being rather contrarian and combative. He often signed his paintings with a butterfly that had a stinger in its tail. While these paintings were looked upon as illustrations in England, in France they were seen as poetic, and in what was to become the spirit of contrarianism of that day, they were exhibited in the 1863 Salon des Refusés, an exhibition of works that had been rejected by the formal Salon.

It was around this time that Whistler began his “frienemy” relationship with French artist, Gustave Courbet, known for promoting realism in art. In fact in the late summer/early autumn of 1864, Whistler and Jo met up with Courbet in the resort town of Trouville on the northern coast of Normandy, where the two artists did seascape painting. It was at this time that Courbet took advantage of having such a lovely model present and began painting a series of portraits of Jo, with her red hair loose, staring into a mirror (see image above). There are four in all, three in museums and one in a private collection. Innocent enough. Jo and Whistler returned to England, but memories of France obviously lingered. In 1866 when Whistler went off on a tour of South America, Jo managed to go back to France and modeled for Courbet. One of the results is below.

Woman with a Parrot by Gustave Courbet, 1866. Metropolitain Museum, New York City. Click picture to magnify.

This painting, unlike the lovely image in the white dress, caused quite a sensation for different reasons, though it was also Courbet’s first to be shown at the Salon. It was criticized for being provocative, the pose too suggestive, and the disheveled hair was shocking. Just the thing to capture the attention of the public and of the artists of the time who were looking to break the mold of the past. Courbet went on to paint another couple of sensational paintings of Jo. One is called Sommeil or the Sleepers (1866), which shows two naked women sleeping in a bed. One of the sleepers is clearly Jo.

However, even more sensational is a painting done originally for a private client, Khalil-Bey, an Turkish-Egyptian diplomat, which became “the most famous painting that was rarely ever seen,” until it was acquired by the Musée D’orsay, where it now is on display. I shall leave you the link to the Musée’s English-Language information on that painting, so that you can discover it for yourselves. It is Origin of the World (1866). www.musee-orsay.fr And yes, Jo was the model.

The Happy Lovers by Gustave Courbet, 1844. Click on picture to magnify

The painting above was done long before Courbet’s affair with Jo. However, it conveys the general idea of what happened. Whistler became known in France as the cuckhold lover, and Courbet? Well, he was Courbet, flamboyant, controversial, and just plain French.

Gustave Courbet was as much of a rabble-rouser as Whistler was an art world disrupter. In fact, Courbet’s ultimate downfall was stiring up a crowd of communards during a period called The Commune just after the Franco-Prussian War, 1871. The crowd went to the Place Vendome and tore down the pillar celebrating Napolean’s victories. Once the government was re-established, Courbet was dealt with severely. He was forbidden to ever show his work in France again; he could never return to his home in the Franche-Comté; and he was fined some 360,000 French Francs, monies that were meant to restore the famous column. (The restored version stands today in the Place Vendome, where one finds the Ritz Hotel.) Since he could not pay, nor return to his beloved home, Courbet fled to Switzerland where he lived for a few years more, dying there in 1877.

Whistler had his own problems. Of course, his romantic relationship with Jo came to an end, though the two of them seemed to hold each other in good regard even to the end of their lives. Whistler moved on to paint his famous Nocturnes in the 1870s and ran afoul of British art critic, John Ruskin, who verbally smeared the paintings so badly that Whistler sued for defamation. Whistler won, but the judgement was one farthing, and the court costs bankrupted him. For a while thereafter, Ruskin’s invectives so tarnished the reputation of the paintings that they were not saleable. Now, of course, they are greatly prized, as well they should be. For more on the Nocturnes see this post on ofartandwine.com.

As for Jo, after her romantic relationships with these artists, she still maintained contact with Whistler, befriended his next mistress, and helped to raise a son he had had with a parlor maid. After the 1880s, she was known to have lived in Nice, France, where she sold antiques and brocantes. She came to London for Whistler’s funeral in 1903, revealing herself by lifting her veil to show her red hair then streaked with some gray. She stood by his coffin for over an hour.

So to end this piece on the strange fame of an artist’s model, I send a personal shout out to the most famous artist’s model of the early 2000’s in my old hometown of Avignon, France. Her name is Sylvette. One of the best galleries there even did a show of artists’ sketches of her – 20 Artists and One Model, Sylvette. The invitation had a wonderful photo of her in a customary pose, and we all knew it was her from the curve of her lovely derriere. So here’s to Sylvette and to all the artist’s models, without whom art would be so much duller.

Paintings used are all in public domain.

Information gathered from Taschen publication, Courbet, written by Fabrice Masanés, 2006.

Marjorie Vernelle is an artist, writer, college professor, and traveler. For more see the Pages at ofartandwine.com or her author page at amazon.com and her art at Vernelle Art Boutique vernellestudio.com.

Wines of the Franche-Comté.

This is the famous Vin Jaune or yellow wine of the Franche-Comté served here along with Comté cheese. Photo credit to Arnaud 25.

Let’s not fool ourselves, the Franche-Comté region, home of the very proud Gustave Courbet, produces many of the finest wines in France. Red, white, or rosé, they are among the best. However, they also produce a regional specialty, Vin Jaune. It is made from a Sauvignin grape, though other regions have tried to replicate the wine with Chardonnay grapes. The Sauvignin is a relative of the Gewurtztraminer, and since the Franche-Comté is right on the Swiss border, the influence of the German wines is felt more strongly. The process of making Vin Jaune is one of long duration, taking six years and a few months to mature in oak barrels that give it a lingering taste of almonds. It even comes in a specific type of bottle, shown in the photo above, called a Clavelin, which according to Regions of France – Franche-Comté (regions-of-france.com) is almost as rare as the wine.

Vin Jaune, however, is not the only yellow wine produced in this region. Vin de Paille, or “straw wine” combines Chardonnay, Sauvignin and Poulsard grapes, which are dried for about two months on open-air racks until they reach 80% dehydration. Then they are pressed and aged in oak casques for two to three years. This labor-intensive process produces a wine with an alcohol content of 15-17%. It is to be served chilled and pairs very well with foie gras. The writer for the article containing information on this wine, as well as several other wines from the Franche-Comte, seems to feel it has “medicinal” properties as well, interfrance.com.

While on the subject of unique alcoholic products made in this mountainous region, I shall digress for a moment to present a special drink. It is not a wine, but a gentian liqueur made from the roots of a mountain flower. One version of it is served in the Hautes Alpes region and is known as génépy. This green liqueur was developed in the middle ages to help people with what they called “le mal des ardents” or a burning sickness. The burning was felt in the extremities, a sensation like having a foot that falls asleep. Normally one can shake off the burning if one gets up and walks around. However, with this sickness, the burning did not stop, because the circulation to the hands and feet was indeed being cut off. It lead to amputations, which were quite common until the mountain people learned from the importation of bread made from wheat that their problem came from eating rye bread. The rye bread had a parasite in it that infected the body and slowly caused circulation problems leading to those amputations. The one thing that they did figure out before learning about the parasite in the rye was that they needed something to keep the blood circulating. They invented a strong liqueur, génépy, to enliven the blood flow. To this day, if you want to give your system a good blast of energy on a cold winter’s night, génépy will do nicely.

Here are pictures of two other mountain liqueurs. The one on the left is a pine liqueur made from pine needles harvested in June. It comes in a wooden bottle and as you can see, it has little stubs of branches that have been cut off of the limb that makes the bottle. The green liqueur is a gentian liqueur made like génépy from the roots of mountain plants.

As has been stated, there are many fine red, white. and rosé wines made in the Franche-Comté. The reds normally are a mixture of grapes with, of course, Pinot Noir as one of the main elements since it is noted for giving a smooth finish. The whites are made from Chardonnay and Sauvignin grapes. The rosés are made from the Poulsard grapes and done in a way that allows it to pair well with charcuterie (cold cut meats). Once again, I refer you to the Interfrance link above for futher information on the food pairings for each of these wines.

Remember that the wine-growing regions of France hold many unusual products with some of the most unusual histories. If you ever visit these areas, including Haute Savoie, and Hautes Alpes, enjoy all the wines, but when the chilly winds blow, go for the génépy.

Since we travel in vicarious ways these days during the pandemic, don’t forget to try out traveling through wine tasting. One great way to do that is to join a wine club. Cellars Wine Club is a fine way to experience the wines of the world and those from here in the U.S. Just click to go directly to cellarswineclub.com

Of Art and Wine affiliates with Bluehost.com and CellarsWineClub.com and may earn from qualifying purchases.

©marjorie vernelle 2020

Coming soon: Degas Makes Pastel Landscapes Dance, plus Pouilly Fuissé Wine.

Landscape with Rocks by Edgar Degas, 1892.

We all know about Degas’ great pastels of ballerinas and dancers of various types. What is less well known is that he also did wonderful pastel landscapes, using a variety of techniques, including doing monotypes that were finished with pastels. Come explore these lesser known but equally beautiful works and see how a modern artist follows in that tradition.